The instructors regarding the study were specialized Enneagram educators from the Narrative Society. This new Enneagram Intensive training Courses made use of five pri sort of boards, (2) didactic learning, (3) meditation knowledge, and you may (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Intense Courses educators followed an outline titled The Enneagram Rigorous®: Integrating Mental Life and you will Heart.
The three Introductory training courses provided pri discovering modalities. The brand new Berkeley movement provided everyday Enneagram types of boards and didactic understanding. New Minnesota path made use of all four of your top training modalities. The fresh new Palo Alto course used Enneagram variety of panels, didactic understanding, and you will experiential mining such as for example led visualization.
Questionnaires had been typed because of the a research assistant and you may provided for a Cook-Greuter-formal SCT scorer (Hy and you can Loevinger 1996) thru post post. Password quantity were used so that the rater was blind in order to the nature of take to, the fresh times of your own shot, therefore the knowledge class types of. The new scorer accompanied the training from the Susan Create-Greuter, utilizing the brand-new Loevinger tips guide, except for stems outside of the guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Obtained solutions was basically sent back with the boffins inside an excel give piece that has been upcoming employed for research investigation. To be sure reliability of your scoring getting leads to which users ran up or off a couple of values, a sample of those training has also been obtained because of the Plan-Greuter by herself.
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.
Because there are a whole lot more over the age of young adults in this test, an analysis try used to check on the relationship between age group and you will education impact. As a whole, 40 participants (33%, letter = ) improved one or more level following studies. Proportionally, alot more fifty–59 12 months olds (45%, letter = ) as compared to most other a long time improved a minumum of one stages once the training (20%, n = 1/5, around 31; 0%, n = 0/3, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–44 12 months olds; and twenty four%, letter = 8/33, 60+ year olds). To look at whether or not so it development was mathematically extreme, a ? dos try regarding versatility try calculated by the evaluating many years category and you may if or not a participant knowledgeable pride stage growth of that or maybe more values following the intervention (or not).
An analysis has also been conducted to test the partnership between new member gender and you can studies effect. Even in the event proportionally, a whole lot more girls (36%, letter = ) than simply men (18%, letter = 4/22) state-of-the-art a minumum of one amount pursuing the education, an effective ? gaydar 2 attempt regarding independence shown zero dating anywhere between intercourse and you may pride invention.
Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.
Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.